Pages

    Friday, September 19, 2014

    Another in the NYTime Opinionator series on religion: See if you can figure it out

    In case you haven't been following along, the NY Times columnist Gary Gutting has been conducting a series of interviews with various pundits, sages and other purported wise men on the subject of religion.  Here's one entitled "Why Take a Stance on God?" which seems to be the most convoluted of all, although you may have your own favorite.  Lots of talking in circles which doesn't seem to be solving anything, IMHO.  By the end, my head was reeling so much that all I could determine with certainly was that the current interviewee felt it was important to take a stance although I think he coyly hinted on which side of the line he would stand.

    If you're really, seriously, improbably interested that much, you can link to other columns in the series from this one.  Warning:  not to be read while under the influence although it might be a good non-pharmaceutical sleep aid.


    http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/09/18/why-take-a-stance-on-god/?ref=opinion

    Thursday, September 18, 2014

    Has RIchard Dawkins lost it?

    From the Guardian, evidence that Dawkins is not perfect, may even have feet of clay.

    http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/sep/18/richard-dawkins-sexist-atheists-bad-name

    Sunday, August 31, 2014

    The September 2014 Bookworm Report

    This is the first of what we expect to be a regular feature:  The Bookworm Report by HSGP member Russell Pizer.  The series will explore books not just on topics such as Humanism and religion but other related topics such as the history of American religious ideas including the Founding Fathers and their relationship, or lack thereof, with religion.  

    The Bookworm Report

    In 1999, I finally found a belief system with which I was – I think I should say – "the most
    comfortable." It was with the Palm Coast, Florida, Freethinkers. I really didn’t know
    what a "Freethinker" was but the meetings of that organization appealed to me.

    After talking with the chairperson, Mimi Cerniglia, individually on a number of
    occasions over the next few months, she suggested I read a book by Bertrand Russell
    titled: Why I Am Not a Christian. It was a book that greatly helped solidify many of my
    thoughts regarding questions I had been asking myself – directly and indirectly –
    since the mid 1950's.  However, I was then confronted with that ugly demon of truth that
    Carl Sagan has identified as the "Bamboozle Factor."

    Carl Sagan has describes this ugly factor in his book, The Demon Haunted
    World. On page 241 this is found: "One of the saddest lessons of history is this: If we’ve
    been bamboozled long enough, we tend to reject any evidence of the bamboozle. We’re
    no longer interested in finding the truth. The bamboozle has captured us. It’s simply too
    painful to acknowledge, even to ourselves, that we’ve been taken . . . "

    This book by Bertrand Russell – Why I am not a Christian – enabled me to ask the
    questions – if only of myself – that I previously had not even considered. For me,
    the facts pointed a way to easily surmount the "Bamboozle Factor."
    For this "Bookworm Report," I will simply lift the description of this book from
    the back cover of the paperback edition that is dated 1957.

    "Dedicated as few men have been to the life of reason, Bertrand Russell has
    always been concerned with the basic questions to which religion also addresses
    itself–questions about man’s place in the universe and the nature of the good life,
    questions that involve life after death, morality, freedom, education and sexual
    ethics. He brings to his treatment of these questions the same courage, scrupulous
    logic and lofty wisdom for which his other work as philosopher, writer and teacher has
    been famous. These qualities make the essays included in this book perhaps the
    most graceful and moving presentation of the freethinker’s position since the days of Hume
    and Voltaire.

    "‘I am as firmly convinced that religions do harm as I am that they are
    untrue,’ Russell declares in his Preface and his reasoned opposition to any system or
    dogma which he feels may shackle man’s mind runs through all these essays in this
    book, whether they were written as early as 1899 or as late as 1954.

    "The book has been edited, with Lord Russell’s full approval and cooperation,
    by Professor Paul Edwards of the Philosophy Department of New York University. In an
    Appendix, Professor Edwards contributes a full account of the highly controversial
    ‘Bertrand Russell Case’ of 1940, in which Russell was judicially declared ‘unfit’ to teach
    philosophy at the College of the City of New York.

    "Whether the reader shares or rejects Bertrand Russell’s views, he will find
    this book an invigorating challenge to set notions, a masterly statement of a
    philosophical position, and a pure joy to read." 


    Russell Pizer

    KJZZ interview with local atheist activist

    Many of you know of Holly S. from the Phoenix Atheist Meetup Group.  Listen as she's interviewed on KJZZ's local Friday program "The Show".

    http://theshow.kjzz.org/content/43454/building-community-around-absence-religion

    Saturday, August 30, 2014

    From the NY Times: Frank Bruni on "Between Godliness and Godlessness"

    Many Humanists profess to be spiritual but not religious.  Here's some support for that position from, of all people, Sam Harris.


    Frank Bruni: between Godliness and Godlessness


    Thursday, August 21, 2014

    Rituals for secular humanists?

    One of the topics of the September 7 meeting is whether humanists can benefit from rituals.  You can get a head start on forming your opinion by reading this article from The Atlantic


    http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2014/08/burying-your-dead-without-religion/378711/?single_page=true

    Friday, August 1, 2014

    Does the Humanist mind fare any better than participants in this study?

    It seems that most people can't stand to be alone with their own thoughts.  What a tragedy!  Here's hoping that the Humanist mind is the exception.  Think about it when you're alone in your own head, if you can find the time, that is.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/27/sunday-review/no-time-to-think.html?hpw&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&version=HpHedThumbWell&module=well-region&region=bottom-well&WT.nav=bottom-well